Skip to main content

Q&A: Muslim woman marrying a Kafir?

Question: Is the prohibition of Muslim women marrying Kuffar qat'i (definitive) or open to difference of opinion? According to Qardawi Umar b. Khattab gave the option to a woman whose husband had become murtadd to either stay with him or to separate. He reference he gives is the ahkaam ahl zimmah by Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah. What would you say about this?

Answer: The marriage of a Muslim woman to a Kafir is definitely baatil (void). Allah (swt) says:

فإن علمتموهن مؤمنات فلا ترجعوهن إلى الكفار لا هن حل لهم ولا هم يحلون لهن

“Then if you ascertain that they are true believers, send them not back to the disbelievers, they are not lawful (wives) for the disbelievers nor are the disbelievers lawful (husbands) for them.” [al-Mumtahinah:10] T

This is a definite text in terms of its authenticity and meaning. Its not open except to one meaning which is that a Muslim woman is not allowed for a Kafir and Kuffar are not allowed for Muslim women. The husband’s disbelief does not allow the nikaah (marriage) to be contracted between him and a Muslim woman. Allah (swt) mentioned the word Kuffar to include all Kafir whether Jew, Christian, Zoroastrian or idolater i.e. any type of kufr which is included by the hukm.

However, the issue over which there was disagreement between the Fuqaha is the issue of the apostasy of the husband when he remains and is not killed after repenting (i.e. if he was outside the Islamic state and his wife was in the Islamic state or if the situation is like today where the ahkam are not implemented). After that the husband returns to Islam during her ‘iddah period i.e. before the end of the wife’s waiting period (‘iddah). The Fuqaha differed over this situation: some said if he returns to Islam before the end of his wife’s waiting period then she is his wife and she will return to him. But if he returns after the end of the ‘iddah then he will require a new contract if he wishes to marry his wife but she will have a choice whether to accept or reject. Others said that if the husband returns to Islam whether during or after the iddah, he will require a new contract and the wife has the option either to accept the marriage contract or to refuse.

Perhaps the incident you mentioned where ‘Umar (ra) gave the choice to a woman whose husband had committed apostasy (if the narration is authentic) is in this vein i.e. after the husband has returned to Islam.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Calling people "kafirs" is offensive and unnecessary...
Islamic Revival said…
It is not offensive nor unnecessary, please see the following article: http://islamicsystem.blogspot.com/2006/11/who-is-kafir.html
Unknown said…
Assalamualaikum,

is it allowed for a Muslim who dont practice islam to marry a woman who just believe that their is a creator but is not from ahlal kitab?
Anonymous said…
What about if the bride was brought up Muslim, but doesn't actually believe in in Islam? My Muslim girlfriend wants to get married in a church, but her parents are a bit weird about it.

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran